So if creative processes are my way of making sense of the world, tagging is my metaphor.
Much of my artistic process has been a thinly veiled attempt to get outdoors and get myself off the computer or get my nose out of a book. I crave adventure, even if it's the small scale variety. Also, I find myself drawn to graffiti. The fascination began when I taught public school and my students and I explored the history and techniques involved with graffiti.
Here's a bit of that history.
Tags, in graffiti writing, are a fairly recent development. A "tag" is the most basic writing of an artist's name in either spray paint, marker, or other often permanent writing/painting tool. A graffiti writer's tag is his or her personalized signature. "Tagging" is often the example given when opponents of graffiti refer to vandalism; the term used to label all acts of graffiti writing (it is by far the most common form of graffiti). Graffiti often has a reputation as being a visible act of a subculture that rebels against authority, although the considerations of the practitioners often diverge and can relate to a wide range of attitudes. It can express a political practice and can form just one tool in an array of resistance techniques. The developments of graffiti art which took place in art galleries and colleges as well as "on the street" or "underground", contributed to the resurfacing in the 1990s of a far more overtly politicized art form in the subvertising, culture jamming or tactical media movements. These movements or styles tend to classify the artists by their relationship to their social and economic contexts, since, in most countries, graffiti art remains illegal in many forms except when using non-permanent paint. Since the 1990's a growing number of artists are switching to temporary paints for a variety of reasons, primarily because is it difficult for the police to apprehend and for the courts to sentence or even convict a person for a protest that is as fleeting and less intrusive than marching in the streets. In some communities, such impermanent works survive longer than works created with permanent paints because the community views the work in the same vein as that of the civil protestor who marches in the street. Protests are finite actions in their duration, but they can have lasting impressions on the "powers that be". In some areas where a number of artist share the impermance ideal, there grows an informal competition. That is, the length of time that a work escapes destruction is related to the amount of respect the work garners in the community. (A crude work that deserves little respect would likely be removed immediately.) The most talented artist might have works last for days.
Artists whose primary object is to assert contol over property and not primarily to create of an expressive work of art (political or otherwise) resist switching to impermanent paints.
These are but a few of the considerations I weighed when I chose the "tag" as my metaphor for artistic and intellectual discovery. Beyond the confines of graffiti, the tag is known as a signification of ownership in many forms. Take for instance, the metadata tag.
We tag web objects to create order, to leave our mark or two cents worth of input to the great information collective. A tag is a keyword or term associated with or assigned to a piece of information (a picture, a map, a blog entry, a video clip etc.), thus describing the item and enabling keyword-based classification and search of information.
Tags are usually chosen informally and personally by item author/creator or by its consumer/viewers/community. Tags are typically used for resources such as computer files, web pages, digital images, and internet bookmarks. For this reason, "tagging" has become associated with the Web 2.0 buzz. Many people associate "tagging" with the idea of the semantic web, however some believe that tagging may not be having a positive effect on the overall drive towards the semantic web. Tag classification, and the concept of connecting sets of tags between web/blog servers, has led to the rise of folksonomy classification over the Internet, the concept of social bookmarking, and other forms of social software. Larger-scale folksonomies tend to address some of the problems of tagging, as astute users of tagging systems will monitor/search the current use of "tag terms" within these systems, and tend to use existing tags in order to easily form connections to related items. In this way, evolving folksonomies define a set of tagging conventions through eventual group consensus, rather than by use of a formalized standard.
Although "tagging" is often promoted as an alternative to organization by a hierarchy of categories, more and more online resources seem to use a hybrid system, where items are organized into broad categories, with finer classification distinctions being made by the use of tags.
Tag is not just the graffiti writer's signature.
It's not just the data you attach to web objects.
It was my favorite game.
It's attached to the inside of my clothing to tell me who the maker was and the outside of my groceries to tell me how much my food will cost.
There are many parts of my life that are tagged.
I can mark my history with the changing meaning of the term.
I photograph tags as a way to illustrate my own personal changes. I can see myself reflected in their chronological evolution. I can hear myself speaking with their words. I can feel myself glow in their colors.
It excites me. The photography is like a game. Sometimes I loose and I get kicked out of the yard.
Sometimes I win and I come home with a cache of images.
I love it when I win.
Tag,
you're it!
Saturday, February 9, 2008
Tagging the metaphor
Posted by Lillian Lewis at 2/09/2008 09:04:00 AM Labels: ABER, art, graffiti, metaphor, photography, tag
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
How does the ownership of the tag of an individual relate to the proliferation of tagging in the graffiti sub-culture?
In other words, or maybe in addition… do you consider graffiti/ tagging to be something of a “call and response”?
Well, I think that the "call and response" aspect of graffiti is an important factor in the frequency of some writers to re-visit favorite sites. In the photography of tagging project I have noticed some tags from writers that span half a decade or more. When I visited LA in the early 90's there were many examples of gang tagging that were only about "call and response", but it was territorial rather than style oriented. Now I see writers critiquing each other. If someone throws up a really bad tag, it will get tagged over or another writer will actually spell out the lack of expertise. I think it's more of a loose competition/collaboration these days rather than marking boundaries and claiming space. It's more about personal recognition than group affiliation. I think that's an important shift in the purpose of much of the tagging I've seen recently. Do gang tags still exist? Yes, but the shift is toward the individual.
How does that relate to ownership? I think that writers "own" their tag in the greatest sense of ownership. Unlike purchased property with one physical form of embodiment and location, such as a car or a house, a tag represents intellectual property that has near infinite forms. The tag can go places the writer never visits, thus extending the writer beyond the physical boundaries in ways that may not be feasible for the writer to enact in person. Unlike the names we are given at birth, or the names our friends or enemies give us, the name a writer gives themselves is very personal property. Nobody can give you the name you give yourself. I think creating that identity and perhaps fighting against the limitations of state, civil or personal identity are key to the dialog among writers. It's a community of self-styled individuals that have conversations in single words.
Post a Comment